Looking back is not a bad thing; it is how we know who we have evolved into today.
This video so reminds me of my many years in the Bronx.
I moved away nearly 20 years ago and really do not think I could ever become accustomed to that environment again but it sure was fun when I was younger.
WE HAVE BEEN LIED TO
BY THE GOVERNMENT That's The Way I C It
Most people believe that when they
buy something that they truly own it. However, when you understand the truth
about maritime law, you will clearly see how this is nothing more than a system
of control set up to enslave the people through fraud, subterfuge, and outright
lies.
Historically, when people used gold
or silver as actual currency, ownership of the object purchased transferred
from the seller to the buyer. If a chair was purchased for $10 and the buyer
paid in $10 worth of gold or silver, it was an even exchange and thus the buyer
completely owned the chair. Today this is no longer true.
In 1913, the 16th amendment was
ratified with authorized the creation of the Federal Reserve Bank (The FED).
The FED then created the "Federal Reserve Note" which is not true
currency at all.
In 1933 the United States was taken
completely off the gold standard. Unknown to most, each U.S. dollar has a
"lien of ownership" that follows it wherever it goes. This lien
transfer's ownership of anything purchased back to the institution that created
it, in this case the Federal Reserve Bank.
Article 1 section 8 of the U.S
Constitution states that Congress alone has the right to "coin
money". However, The FED is a private foreign bank and the U.S. dollar is
not United States money, despite the fact that it says "Federal Reserve
Note" on each dollar printed. This is very important to understand and set
in mind.
Ever since the
"ratification" of the 16th amendment and the creation of the
"Federal Reserve note" nothing that you purchase is truly yours.
Ownership of all items purchased ultimately reverts back to the "Federal
Reserve Bank" or (FED) due to the "lien of ownership" or
"Maritime Hypothecation" that is attached to every dollar created by
the fed.
"By 1938 the gradual
merger procedurally between law and equity actions (i.e., the same court has
jurisdiction over legal, equitable, and admiralty matters) was recognized. The
nation was bankrupt and was owned by its creditors (the international bankers)
who now owned everything -- the Congress, the Executive, the courts, all the
States and their legislatures and executives, all the land, and all the people.
Everything was mortgaged in the national debt. We had gone from being
sovereigns over government to subjects under government, through the use of
negotiable instruments to discharge our debts with limited liability, instead
of paying our debts at common law with gold or silver coin. The remainder of
this article explains how this happened, where we are today, and what remedy we
have to protect ourselves from this system." (uslawbooks.com/books/freeman_common_law.htm)
Due to various sleights of hand
perpetrated by crafty lawyers beginning in 1852, a change from the common law
over to maritime law took place. This change allowed the courts to now take
control of all commerce on land as it does on the seas. Because we are under
maritime law, humans themselves are now considered "a vessel on the
seas". This gave the government the right to ticket, tax and even deny
people the right to a trial by jury and due process, effectively bypassing our
guaranteed constitutional rights.
This maritime law now applies to
money because of something called a "maritime hypothecation". An
"Hypothecation is
the practice where a borrower pledges collateral to secure a debt or a
borrower, as a condition precedent to a loan, has a third party (usually an
affiliate) pledge collateral for the borrower. The borrower retains ownership
of the collateral, but it is "hypothetically" controlled by the
creditor in that he has the right to seize possession if the borrower defaults.
A common example occurs when a consumer enters into a mortgage agreement, in
which the consumer's house becomes collateral until the mortgage loan is paid
off."(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothecation)
A Maritime Lien or Hypothecation,
sometimes referred to as a "tacit hypothecation", is a maritime lien
on a vessel, given to secure the claim of a creditor who provided maritime
services to the vessel or who suffered an injury from the vessel's use.
Maritime liens are sometimes referred to as tacit hypothecation. Maritime liens
have little in common with other liens under the laws of most jurisdictions.
The maritime lien has been described
as "one of the most striking peculiarities of Admiralty law". A
maritime lien constitutes a security interest upon ships of a nature otherwise
unknown to the common law or equity. It arises purely by operation of law and
exists as a claim upon the property concerned, both secret and invisible, often
given priority by statute over other forms of registered security interest.
Although characteristics vary under the laws of different countries, it can be
described as:
1.a privileged claim,
2.upon maritime property,
3.for service to it or damage done by
it,
4.accruing from the moment that the
claim attaches,
5.travelling with the property
unconditionally,
6.enforced by an action in rem.
This "lien" is both secret
and invisible. It normally applies to ships at sea, but since all humans born
in the U.S. are now also considered a "vessel on the sea" we also
fall under this jurisdiction, as does our currency. How are we considered a
"vessel on the sea" you're probably wondering???
When a ship pulls into a dock (in
the water), it is assigned a "berth" which is "the space
allotted to a vessel at anchor or at a wharf". The ship is also assigned a
"berth certificate". Currency is exchanged for the offloaded goods
delivered via the dock to the country taking ownership of said goods.
Every human being is born out of
water from their mother's womb. The mother is sent to the delivery room to be
delivered by the doctor (dock), and afterward the child receives a birth
certificate by the country of birth which now indicates that person as a
citizen. The child is literally owned by that country. How?
The doctor (dock) is paid with
Federal Reserve notes, which contain the lien of ownership upon every dollar
created, so even a child being delivered from his or her mother’s womb becomes
the property of the institution that created the currency, in this case, the
U.S. Federal Reserve Bank. This means that the Federal Reserve Bank literally
and legally owns everything purchased with those dollars, including
you!!
STRAWMAN or straw man, as defined in Black’s Law
Dictionary, 6th Edition: A front; a third party who is put up in name only to
take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an
agent for another for the purpose of taking title to real property and
executing whatever documents and instruments the principal may direct
respecting the property. Person who purchases property for another to conceal
identity of real purchaser, or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not
allowed. It is said that you can regain control by taking out a lien against
your birth certificate.
There's no telling when the deception really started, but
one of the first major events was the incorporation of the United States in
1871, with the final act occurring in 1878. It appears from the Statutes at
Large that this was only the incorporation of the District of Columbia, but in
the final act the phrase District of Columbia or United States is used making
the phrases interchangeable and allowing the United States to operate as a
corporation.
The so-called government is not the government created by
the Constitution; it is a Corporation operating in COMMERCE for PROFIT.
See: TITLE 28 United States Code Sec.
3002
TITLE 28 -
JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE
PART VI - PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS
CHAPTER 176 - FEDERAL DEBT COLLECTION PROCEDURE
SUBCHAPTER A - DEFINITIONS AND GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 3002. Definitions
(15) "United States" means -
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or
other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States. [this
would include states, counties and cities]
Every transaction is now considered by the US,
INCORPORATED to be a commercial transaction by fictional entities (fictions at
law).
What is a Fiction at Law?
A fiction at law, or legal fiction, is an artificially
created entity that is only contemplated in law. In other words, it is not real
except in the eyes of the law written by men.
Legal fictions are the opposite of natural entities, such
as people. A created legal fiction is endowed by the law to have some
privileges that resemble the rights that people have, such as the right to hold
property and to sue and be sued.
The most common legal fictions are corporations and
trusts. These have been around for quite some time with their main purpose
being to limit the liability of the people holding the corporation or trust,
allowing them to NOT be personally responsible for their actions.
Legal Fictions are not compatible with the Common Law,
which is the law our land was founded upon. In common law, everyone is
responsible for his own actions and is held accountable and responsible for any
wrongdoing (harming another in any way)
What does this have
to do with me?
In 1933, the governors of all the states met to discuss
the emergency declared by FDR and to support the new process that was being
established. The government was in bankruptcy and had to be funded in its state
of bankruptcy.
The governors made a pledge to the U.S., INCORPORATED to
fund it. The pledge was that the assets and the energy of the people would back
the government and secure the debt but there was one little problem. Natural
living people cannot mix with legal fictions (corporations) so it was necessary
to create a bridge between the fictions and the people to bring the people
under and make them subservient to the government corporation.
When the governors made the pledge, they agreed to
register the birth certificates of the people with the U.S. Department of
Commerce. The birth certificate is the security instrument (collateral) used to
back up the pledge. The legal fiction was created by using the name on the
birth certificate and writing it in all capital letters, the designation for a
legal fiction. Then, because of the pledge YOU were determined to be the surety
TITLE 31 U.S.C.
(the one who is responsible to pay) for the legal fiction.
So, when the government or any corporation uses any
process whatsoever they are using it against the legal fiction, which they want
YOU to think IS YOU. But when your name is written in all capital letters, IT
IS NOT YOUR NAME!! It is the designation of a legal fiction that is an entirely
separate entity. A living human cannot be a legal fiction, and a legal fiction
cannot be a living human. One is real or natural; the other is created by law.
Whenever a government agency (such as a court) determines
liability it is a liability of the legal fiction or STRAWMAN since everything
is done in commerce. You are presumed, as evidenced by the pledge of your
governor, to be the surety for the STRAWMAN and you must pay the liability.
You are the only one
who gives value!
Since you are the only one who gives “value” to the birth
certificate due to your labor, you, are the only one who can go to the bank and
redeem and regain control of the birth certificate. Just like the car. The car
gives value to the title to the car. You give value to the title, the birth
certificate. Without you, the birth certificate is worthless.
Right now even though they have no legal right or claim
or lien, the bankers control your “title”/birth certificate. Some say that you can regain control by simply
filing a notice of lien against the birth certificate. It is said this is done every day. Banks file
notices of liens with the department of commerce to prove and establish their
interest in all kinds of property... homes, cars, tools, equipment. This is
done very simply by contacting the secretary of state or dept. of commerce and
filing a UCC-1 financing statement and listing the property as collateral, on
the statement. The idea is that the same
can be done with the birth certificate, which is your property. You and only you
can file this notice of lien... you and only you, can determine the value of
the property.
Since you are priceless in God's eyes the value of your
UCC-1 should be UNLIMITED.
With all those raging
hormones, every teenager is bound to “lose it” at one time or another. But a
recent study suggests that adolescents’ attacks of anger may indicate something
more serious than your standard puberty-related mood swings: nearly two-thirds
of youth report having had a bout of uncontrollable anger that involved
threatening violence, destroying property or engaging in violence toward
others, and nearly 8% — or close to 6 million teens — meet the criteria for
intermittent explosive disorder (IED), which is characterized by persistent,
out-of-control anger attacks that can’t be explained by a mental or medical
disorder or substance use.
The findings, by
researchers at Harvard Medical School, came from national surveys of nearly
6,500 American teens, aged 13 to 17, and their parents. The researchers found
that IED was more common than thought, and that it is severe and persistent;
kids usually start showing signs of IED in late childhood and the disorder
persists through adolescence, the authors say. IED in teens is also linked with
later problems, like depression and substance abuse in adulthood.
The study found,
however, that many teens weren’t getting the help they needed. Among the study
participants, 38% of those with IED received treatment for emotional problems
in the year prior to the survey, but only 17% of these teens — or just 6.5% of
all teens who had diagnosable IED — had received treatment specifically for
anger.
If IED could be detected
and treated early, however, clinicians could help prevent a substantial amount
of future violence and related mental harms, said senior author Ronald Kessler,
professor of health care policy at Harvard Medical School.
To meet the definition
of IED, according to the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a person must have
three episodes of “impulsive aggressiveness grossly out of proportion to any
precipitating psychosocial stressor,” at any time during their lives. In the
current study, the researchers also used narrower definitions of IED that required
attacks of anger within the previous 12 months and found that many teens met
the standard. (The study excluded teens with other mental or emotional
disorders like bipolar disorder, ADHD, oppositional defiant disorder and
conduct disorder.)
“It’s a problem because
it really gets in the way of your life,” says Kessler. “There are lots of
things people don’t get treatment for because it doesn’t really impact them.
This does. The problem is an awful lot of people have it — more than I thought
— it’s awfully chronic, and it’s impairing.”
The authors find that
IED is not only underdiagnosed, but understudied as well. They write: “The
number of PubMed research reports dealing with panic attacks is roughly 60
times the number dealing with anger attacks even though the lifetime prevalence
of IED is considerably higher than the prevalence of panic disorder.”
Part of the problem may
be that overly angry or aggressive people fail to acknowledge their own
behavior. “I think one reason [IED] is understudied is that people who have
these anger problems very often do not consider it a problem. They don’t go in
for help. They may get arrested, but they don’t seek help on their own,” says
Kessler. “Some things like this and other social disorders can fall through the
cracks, and this is one of them.”
The authors say further
research is needed to understand the risk factors for IED in teens and to
improve diagnosis, screening and treatments.
The findings are published in the journal Archives of General Psychiatry.
Televison Shows
Which, Through Mind Altering Messages,
Turn
Our Youth Into Rebellious, Sexually Promiscuous, Self-Centered, Disrespectful
and Desensitized.
The young
cast members are paid to do nothing but party and create drama. With partying,
comes drinking, mistakes, and confusion and this show is designed to “appeal” to
the young viewers. MTV is glamorizing a lifestyle of drunken mistakes.We see out own everyday teen aged girls with their
hair done up in the famous snookie hairstyle (The poof), trying to talk like
Snookie, and even act like Snookie. These
young girls must think that the Jersey Shore cast are just the coolest. I look at them and see changes in her
personality. Why? Because look who their role models are! People who drink
their problems away and let their hormones do the talking.
Another
effect is that children begin to show bad behaviors, like fighting, using
profanity, etc. For example, a reality TV show that airs on MTV called The Real
World, majority of the roommates fight a lot and use profanity over the most
idiotic and unnecessary things due to either misunderstanding or high intake of
alcohol.
Pay close attention to what you see,
because you have no idea how much it impacts you and your children as people.
"Noneducational" reality TV includes shows like Keeping
Up With The Kardashians, Teen Pregnancy, and My Sweet Sixteen. These prime time shows
target youth, but they do not teach lessons. In fact, they do the opposite,
since many young people think it okay to emulate these reality show stars.
These shows promote drinking and heavy sexual content. Nonetheless they air in
the time slot that targets youth. Kids seem to be growing up faster than just
20 years ago; perhaps disrespect and aggression can be blamed on the influence
of the shows they are watching.
Instead of fighting and being rude to each other, it would be nice
if the characters in these shows could, for example, reflect how ten ordinary
people come into a house and work together to make the quality of life better
for everyone. They could show the reality of working together to pay the bills
and keep food on the table. They could teach how to step in when something bad
happens to someone else and help them get back on their feet in one way or
another.
Video Games:
A study of video games found that the few female
characters in those games are often highly sexualized—wearing tight revealing
clothing and having unrealistically large breasts and distorted small waists. (Girls
and Gaming, Children Now; 2000)
Video games and
other media sometimes use prostitutes as characters that are targets for
the male hero. In a game from the Duke
Nukem series, prostitutes are forced to strip and are then killed. In the
number one selling video game for 2001, Grand
Theft Auto III, the player can "clobber" a
prostitute with a baseball bat, with a new game technique, that allows the
player to feel he or she is really doing this. In other popular media,
prostitutes and strippers are often included to add scenes of female
breasts and rear-ends on camera. These "games" offer viewers
images of women and female sexuality associated with exchanging sex for
money, and sex with violence.
Non-realistic
and unhealthy body image:
The women seen
most often in the media are fashion models, pop stars (singers) and
actresses. (We don’t like the word "supermodel," ‘cause they
really don’t do anything that super.) Many women seen often in the media,
especially models and increasingly actresses, are seriously underweight,
and many diet and smoke to keep their natural weight off. (A girl or woman
who diets and is underweight can be undernourished, sometimes even losing her
menstrual period. Prolonged loss of periods can lead to fertility
problems---while constant or extreme dieting also carries health risks and
can actually lead to long-term weight gain.) (Body Wars, by
Margo Maine, 2000)
In a 1992 study
of female students at Stanford University, 70% of women reported feeling
worse about themselves and their bodies after looking at magazines. (A
British study also had a similar finding.) Roughly 50% of teen girls in
the U.S. read teen or adult fashion magazines. (Body Wars)
In movies, body
doubles are often used to substitute for "imperfect" female
movie stars (such as America’s favorite actress Julia Roberts, in one of
America’s favorite movies, Pretty
Woman). Eighty-five percent of these body doubles have breast
implants. (Jean Kilbourne, Can't Buy My Love, 2001)
Scientific
evidence suggests many women with breast implants have some adverse
affects: pain, permanently deformed skin if implant is removed, loss of
sensation in breast, interference with early detection of a tumor, and
potential links with serious auto-immune disorders. (National
Research Center for Women and Families.ca: Wash., D.C.)
Studies show
that all plastic surgeries among teens increased by almost 50% from
1996-1998, mostly for girls. At the same time there have been more
advertisements for breast implants and other surgeries, and more models,
actresses, and singers as "advertisements" for the surgeries
(think Cher, Pamela Anderson, Demi Moore, Mariah Carey, and some have
suggested, Britney). (newswecanuse.com; 1/9/01)
Hate and violence directed at women:
Words expressing hate and disrespect toward girls and
women are used frequently in popular media, and especially on TV and
radio. Use of words derogatory to girls and women like "bitch,"
"slut," "whore," and "ho" can be heard on
many TV and radio programs, especially those watched and listened to by
kids, including WWF (wrestling) programs, That 70’s Show, and Boston
Public, as well as on the radio.
Advertisements from some segments of the fashion
industry use images of violence against a woman and try to make it
fashionable or erotic. An ad for jeans in Elle shows three men physically
attacking a woman; an Italian edition of Vogue shows an ad with a man
pointing a gun at the face of a naked woman wrapped in plastic; from an
American skateboard manufacturer, an ad aimed at young men shows a man
pointing a gun at the head of a female, along with the slogan
"bitch." (Jean Kilbourne, Can't Buy My Love, 2001)
Dragon Age: Origins Video Game- City Elf Trailer Depicts Violence Against Women
Some Things You Should Know About Media Violence and Media
Literacy
Media violence
can lead to aggressive behavior in children. Over 1,000 studies confirm
this link.
By age 18, the
average American child will have viewed about 200,000 acts of violence on
television alone.
The level of
violence during Saturday morning cartoons is higher than the level of
violence during prime time. There are 3 to 5 violent acts per hour in
prime time, versus 20 to 25 acts per hour on Saturday morning.
Media violence
is especially damaging to young children (under age 8) because they cannot
easily tell the difference between real life and fantasy. Violent images
on television and in movies may seem real to young children. They can be
traumatized by viewing these images.
Media violence
affects children by:
a)Increasing
aggressiveness, rage and anti-social behavior.
b)Increasing
their fear of becoming victims.
c)Turning
them against their parents, making them disrespectful to their parents, elders and
authority figures; sometimes even violent.
d)Making
them less sensitive to violence and to victims of violence.
e)Increasing
their appetite for more violence in entertainment and in real life.
Media violence often fails to show the consequences of violence.
This is especially true of cartoons, toy commercials and music videos. As a result, children learn that there are few if any repercussions for committing violent acts.
Parents can reduce the effect media violence has on children by:
Limiting the amount of television children watch to 1 to 2 hours a day. Monitoring the programs children watch and restricting children's viewing of violent programs. Monitoring the music videos and films children see, as well as the music children listen to, for violent themes. Teaching children alternatives to violence.
Parents can help children develop media literacy skills by:
Helping children distinguish between fantasy and reality.
Teaching them that real-life violence has consequences.
Watching television with children and discussing the violent acts and images that are portrayed.
Ask children to think about what would happen in real life if the same type of violent act were committed. Would anyone die or go to jail? Would anyone be sad? Would the violence solve problems or create them?
I have added a post (above) of an article which I found to be interesting regarding teen anger/rage
and am including the link to it below;
it suggests that overwhelming anger /rage may be a disorder.
